TECHNICAL NOTE
Refining Growth Modulation:
A Simplified Approach to Tension Band Plate Application
J. Javier Masquijo, Ariadna Casado Castillo, Victoria Allende
Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba,
Argentina
ABSTRACT
Growth
modulation using tension
band plates (TBPs)
is a well-established technique for the gradual
correction of pediatric limb deformities. This study presents
a refined surgical
technique for TBP application designed
to simplify the procedure while
maintaining accuracy and safety.
Key technical modifications include precise placement
of guidewires using defined anatomical landmarks as
references, the use of a minimal incision,
and the incorporation of self-tapping screws to eliminate
the need for pre-drilling. Clinical application of this modified
approach reduces operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure, and
surgical incision length while ensuring accurate TBP placement.
Keywords: Children; angular deformities; limb length discrepancy; guided growth; tension band plate.
Level of Evidence: IV
Perfeccionando
el crecimiento guiado: un enfoque simplificado para la aplicación
de placas de banda de tensión
RESUMEN
El crecimiento guiado mediante placas de banda de tensión es una técnica bien establecida para la corrección gradual de deformidades angulares en los miembros de los niños. Se presenta una técnica quirúrgica refinada para la aplicación de placas de banda de tensión, diseñada para simplificar el procedimiento manteniendo la precisión y la seguridad. Las modificaciones técnicas clave incluyen la colocación precisa de clavijas guía referenciadas a puntos de referencia anatómicos definidos, la utilización de una incisión mínima y la incorporación de tornillos autorroscantes para evitar la necesidad de utilizar una broca. La aplicación clínica de este enfoque modificado disminuye el tiempo quirúrgico, la exposición a la radioscopia intraoperatoria y la longitud de la incisión quirúrgica, al tiempo que garantiza una
colocación precisa del implante.
Palabras clave: Niños; deformidades angulares; discrepancia de longitud de miembros; crecimiento guiado; placa de banda de tensión.
Nivel de Evidencia: IV
Guided
growth is a widely accepted method employing temporary hemiepiphysiodesis
to correct pediatric angular limb deformities and address leg length
discrepancies by leveraging the remaining growth potential of the immature
skeleton. This approach is minimally
invasive and reversible, offering distinct advantages over corrective osteotomies, including accelerated recovery, permission for immediate weight-bearing, and decreased overall morbidity. The fundamental principle is rooted in the
observations of Hueter and Volkmann,
who described the influence of mechanical forces on physeal growth.1-3
Historically,
guided growth techniques evolved from early methods such as Phemister’s open
epiphysiodesis4 and Blount physeal stapling5.
These were subsequently refined with the introduction of percutaneous epiphysiodesis utilizing transphyseal screws (PETS) by Métaizeau.6 A significant advancement occurred in the
early 2000s when Stevens introduced the tension band plate (TBP).7 This implant provided a more stable and
predictable construct for temporary
hemiepiphysiodesis, substantially reducing implant
complications and the need for revision
surgery compared to physeal staples.
Consequently, the TBP rapidly
became the preferred device for guided growth procedures. Recognizing the
potential for further optimization, Masquijo et al.8 introduced initial refinements to the TBP application technique in 2015, improving procedural efficiency while
maintaining accuracy and safety. These prior modifications
were associated with reduced operative time, decreased fluoroscopy exposure,
and smaller incisions while ensuring precise implant placement.
The
purpose of this paper and the accompanying video is to provide a comprehensive,
step-by-step description of the authors’
preferred refined technique for TBP placement
for the management of pediatric angular deformities
and leg length discrepancies. This
resource aims to serve as a valuable guide for orthopedic surgeons performing
guided growth procedures in skeletally immature patients.
The patient
is positioned supine
on a radiolucent operating table
under regional anesthesia. The affected limb is
prepared and draped in a sterile fashion
to maintain strict
aseptic technique throughout the procedure. A pneumatic
tourniquet is applied to the proximal thigh
and inflated to the appropriate pressure to provide
a bloodless surgical field, thereby enhancing
visualization.
Under
fluoroscopic guidance, the initial guidewire is carefully inserted into the
epiphysis. The trajectory is directed at approximately a 40-degree angle relative to the longitudinal axis of the bone, aiming toward the anatomical landmark
of the femoral notch when operating on the distal
femur. The precise
distance between the guidewire
tip and the distal femoral
physis is determined by the size of the tension band plate being
used. For example,
when using a 20 mm TBP, which is commonly selected for the distal femur
in adolescents, the guidewire should be positioned 10 mm distal to the physis.
This position aligns with the spacing between the central and distal screw
holes of the plate. The TBP is then temporarily advanced over the guidewire, and its position
relative to the physis
and the mechanical axis is assessed fluoroscopically in the sagittal
plane. Once the optimal position
is confirmed, the skin is
marked with a surgical pen along the edges of the plate to create an external
reference for alignment. The guidewire should be positioned as close as possible to the proximal
margin of the distal screw hole to facilitate
seamless screw placement after the plate is inserted through the small skin
incision.
A
second guidewire is then inserted into the metaphysis. This wire is placed
divergent to the epiphyseal wire and oriented perpendicular to the femoral
diaphysis in the coronal plane.
Initial clinical assessment is performed to ensure both guidewires lie in the same
sagittal plane and exhibit appropriate divergence (Figure
1).
Fluoroscopic
confirmation is then obtained to verify the correct spatial relationship and
positioning of both guidewires relative to the physis and bone anatomy before
proceeding with the incision.
The
temporary guide plate is removed, and a small skin incision, typically
measuring 2 cm in length, is made midway between the two guidewires. Blunt dissection is carefully carried
down through the subcutaneous tissue to expose the periosteum. Meticulous effort is made to preserve the periosteum and the perichondral ring to minimize soft tissue disruption and avoid potential
growth disturbance. The joint capsule, if encountered, is delicately opened to
expose the bone surface without compromising the epiphyseal vessels. A tension band plate of the selected size
(this plate is not used over the skin but is the implant for insertion) is then
carefully guided over the two previously placed guidewires and seated flush
against the bone surface. Two fully
threaded 4.5 mm self-tapping screws are then inserted sequentially through the
plate holes, following the trajectories of the guide-wires. The epiphyseal screw
is inserted first
to secure the distal aspect
of the plate to the epiphysis. Subsequently, the metaphyseal screw is inserted to stabilize the proximal aspect
of the construct. The use of self-tapping screws eliminates the need for pre-drilling the screw holes,
further streamlining the procedure. Final implant positioning is meticulously confirmed using C-arm
fluoroscopy in both the coronal
and sagittal planes.
This ensures accurate plate alignment relative to the
physis and mechanical axis, verifies stable fixation, and confirms that the
screws have not violated
the physis. The five essential
fluoroscopic views required
to confirm proper TBP placement
are illustrated in Figure 2.
Following implant
insertion and confirmation, the surgical site is thoroughly irrigated with sterile
saline solution to remove any
debris. Hemostasis is achieved, and the wound is closed in layers using
absorbable sutures. A #2 Vicryl® suture is typically used for the subcutaneous
tissue, and a #4.0 Vicryl® rapid suture is used for the skin closure. Sterile
adhesive strips are applied over the incision, followed by a sterile dressing
and a soft compressive
bandage (Video).
Postoperatively, patients
are permitted full weight-bearing and unrestricted range of motion of the affected limb as tolerated immediately following
surgery. Follow-up clinical and radiographic evaluations are scheduled every
three to four months to monitor the progression of deformity correction and to identify
any signs of potential over-correction, allowing for timely
implant removal (Figure 3).
Growth
modulation using tension band plates (TBPs) has significantly advanced the
management of pediatric limb deformities, providing a minimally invasive,
highly effective, and reversible treatment alternative to osteotomies.9 While the original
technique described by Stevens7 remains the foundation, continuous refinements to the
surgical approach are pursued to further enhance
procedural efficiency, minimize
invasiveness, and reduce
associated morbidity. The modified TBP placement technique
presented here builds upon our prior work8
by introducing specific technical optimizations designed to streamline key surgical steps,
resulting in demonstrated reductions in
operative time, intraoperative radiation exposure, and incision size while preserving implant accuracy. Our refined
approach enhances TBP placement through several key modifications. The use of precise guidewire
positioning, referenced to anatomical
landmarks and verified with a limited set of standardized fluoroscopic views,
improves the accuracy of initial implant trajectory planning. Minimizing soft
tissue dissection through a smaller incision potentially contributes to faster
recovery and reduced
post-operative discomfort. The incorporation of self-tapping
screws eliminates the need for the pre-drilling step, simplifying the procedure and further reducing
operative time. Collectively,
these modifications result in a more reproducible and efficient technique that
maintains the biomechanical effectiveness of the tension band principle for
guided growth.
A particularly significant advantage of our modified
technique is the substantial reduction in intraoperative fluoroscopy usage. Traditional TBP
application often necessitates multiple fluoroscopic checks at various stages
to ensure proper guidewire and plate positioning, leading to increased
radiation exposure. By optimizing guidewire placement based on anatomical cues and using a defined
set of only five standardized fluoroscopic views for final
confirmation, our technique effectively minimizes radiation. This is paramount
in pediatric orthopedics, where minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation is a
critical priority. Children are more susceptible to the detrimental effects of
radiation due to their actively dividing cells and longer remaining lifespan,
increasing the lifetime risk of radiation-induced malignancies. Furthermore,
cumulative intraoperative radiation exposure poses significant occupational
hazards for the surgical team, particularly to less shielded areas such as the
hands and thyroid. Our method aligns with the ALARA (As Low As
Reasonably Achievable) principle, enhancing the safety profile of the guided
growth procedure for both the patient and all operating room personnel without
compromising the precision or effectiveness of implant placement. The use of an
external guidewire reference and verifying wire divergence prior to incision
further contributes to accurate initial positioning, reducing the need for
subsequent radiographic adjustments.
The refined
technique for tension
band plate application described herein represents an accessible, efficient, and reproducible alternative to standard TBP placement. The
demonstrated advantages, including reduced operative time, decreased
fluoroscopy exposure, smaller
incisions, and maintained accuracy, offer benefits
for both surgeons and patients while significantly enhancing surgical efficiency. As guided growth
remains a cornerstone in the treatment of pediatric limb deformities,
continued refinement of surgical techniques, such as the approach presented,
will further optimize outcomes and improve the overall safety and efficacy of
the procedure.
REFERENCES
1.
Volkmann R. Chirurgische Erfahrungen über Knochenverbiegungen und Knochenwachstum. Archiv f pathol Anat 1862;24:512-40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01879454
2.
Hueter C. Anatomische Studien an den Extremitätengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener. Archiv f Pathol Anat 1862;25:572-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01879806
3.
Hueter C. Anatomische Studien an den Extremitätengelenken Neugeborener und Erwachsener. Archiv f Pathol Anat 1863;28:253-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01931788
4.
Phemister D. Operative
arrestment of longitudinal growth of bones in the treatment of deformities. J Bone Joint
Surg Am 1933;15(1):1-15. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/abstract/1933/15010/operative_arrestment_of_longitudinal_growth_of.1.aspx
5.
Blount WP, Clarke
GR. Control of bone growth
by epiphyseal stapling: a preliminary report.
J
Bone Joint Surg Am
1949;31:464-78. PMID: 18153890
6.
Métaizeau JP, Wong-Chung J, Bertrand
H, Pasquier P. Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws
(PETS). J Pediatr Orthop
1998;18(3):363-9. PMID: 9600565
7.
Stevens PM. Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr
Orthop 2007;27(3):253-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31803433a1
8.
Masquijo JJ, Lanfranchi L, Torres-Gomez A, Allende V. Guided growth with the tension band plate construct: a prospective comparison of 2 methods of implant placement. J Pediatr Orthop 2015;35(3):e20-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000263
9.
Masquijo JJ, Artigas C, de Pablos
J. Growth modulation with tension-band plates for the correction of paediatric lower limb angular
deformity: current concepts
and indications for a rational use. EFORT Open Rev 2021;6(8):658-68. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200098
A. Casado Castillo ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7001-0480
V. Allende
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-7276
Received on May 1st, 2025. Accepted
after evaluation on March 19th, 2026 • Dr. J. JAVIER MASQUIJO
• jmasquijo@gmail.com • https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9018-0612
How to cite this article: Masquijo JJ, Casado
Castillo A, Allende
V. Refining Growth
Modulation: A Simplified Approach to Tension
Band Plate Application. Rev Asoc Argent
Ortop Traumatol 2026;91(3):280-285. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.3.2159
Article Info
Identification: https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.3.2159
Published: June, 2026
Conflict of interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Copyright: © 2026, Revista de la Asociación
Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología.
License: This article is under Attribution-NonCommertial-ShareAlike 4.0
International Creative Commons License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).