CLINICAL RESEARCH
Is Facet Tropism Associated with
Degenerative Disc Disease and the Laterality of Disc Protrusions?
Damián Bendersky,
Mauro Ormeño Figueroa
Consultorio
de Dolor, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
ABSTRACT
Objective: To
evaluate whether an association exists between facet tropism (FT) and severe
degenerative disc disease (DDD) at the same spinal level, and whether there is
a correlation between the side of lumbar disc protrusion and the side of the
more sagittally oriented facet joint at that level. Materials and
Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging
studies of 300 L4–L5 and L5–S1 levels were analyzed. Bilateral facet
orientation angles, the difference in facet inclination between both sides, and
the degree of disc degeneration were measured. In a subgroup of 93 L4–L5 and
L5–S1 levels with disc protrusions, the correspondence between protrusion
laterality and the side of the more sagittal facet joint was assessed. Results: No statistically significant association was found between
FT and severe DDD (p = 0.0904). Likewise, no significant difference in facet
inclination was observed between levels with mild and severe DDD (p = 0.9207).
In the subgroup with lumbar disc protrusions, no statistically significant
association was identified between the side of the protrusion and the side of
the more sagittally oriented facet joint (p = 0.1500). Conclusions: No statistically significant association was found between
facet tropism and severe degenerative disc disease at the L4–L5 and L5–S1
levels, nor between the side of disc protrusion and the side of the more
sagittally oriented facet joint at those levels.
Keywords:
Intervertebral disc degeneration; intervertebral disc displacement; facet
tropism; lumbar spine.
Level of Evidence: III
¿Se asocia el tropismo facetario con la enfermedad
degenerativa y la lateralidad de las protrusiones?
RESUMEN
Objetivos: Evaluar
si existe una asociación entre la presencia de tropismo facetario y la
enfermedad degenerativa del disco severa en ese nivel,
y si existe una correlación entre el lado de la protrusión lumbar y el lado de
la articulación facetaria más sagital en ese mismo nivel estudiado. Materiales y
Métodos: Se evaluaron las imágenes de
resonancia magnética de 300 niveles L4-L5 y L5-S1, midiendo los grados de
inclinación facetaria bilateralmente, la diferencia entre la inclinación de las
facetas de ambos lados y el grado de degeneración discal. En un subgrupo de 93
niveles L4-L5 y L5-S1 con protrusiones discales, se evaluó si la lateralidad se
correspondía con el lado en el que la faceta era más sagital. Resultados: No se halló una asociación estadísticamente significativa
entre el tropismo facetario y la enfermedad degenerativa del
disco severa (p = 0,0904). Lo mismo ocurrió al comparar la diferencia de
grados entre aquellos con enfermedad degenerativa del disco leve o severa (p =
0,9207). En el subgrupo con protrusiones lumbares, no se encontró una
asociación estadísticamente significativa entre el lado de la protrusión y el
lado de la faceta más sagital (p = 0,1500). Conclusiones: No halló una asociación estadísticamente significativa
entre el tropismo facetario y la enfermedad degenerativa del
disco severa en los niveles L4-L5 y L5-S1, ni entre el lado de la
protrusión y el lado de la faceta más sagital en esos mismos niveles.
Palabras clave:
Degeneración del disco intervertebral; desplazamiento del disco intervertebral;
lumbar; tropismo facetario.
Nivel de Evidencia: III
INTRODUCTION
Facet
joints assist the intervertebral disc in load bearing, and their degeneration
is associated with degenerative disc disease at the same spinal level, and vice versa, forming a functional complex of three joints per
level. In addition, facet joints protect the disc from excessive torsional
stress and contribute to segmental stability during flexion, extension, and
rotation.1-4 Facet orientation is
defined as the angle of the facet joint relative to the sagittal plane and
influences the degree of vertebral mobility and rotation along different axes.2,3
Facet
tropism is defined as the difference in facet joint inclination between the
right and left sides.1,2,3,5 This
asymmetry may generate abnormal loading of the facet joints and the
intervertebral disc, thereby increasing the likelihood of disc damage. During
lumbar spine flexion, the vertebra tends to rotate toward the side with the
more coronally oriented facet joint, producing an unbalanced force on the disc.
Over time, this may lead to annulus fibrosus damage on the more sagittally
oriented side through a traction mechanism, thus predisposing to disc
protrusion on that side. This same mechanism may also contribute to the
development of degenerative disc disease at that level.1,3,6-8
The
present study evaluated whether an association exists between the presence of
facet tropism and severe degenerative disc disease at the same level.
Additionally, we assessed whether there is a correlation between the side of
lumbar disc protrusion and the side of the more sagittally oriented facet joint
at that level.
In a
previously published study that included a smaller number of analyzed levels,
no statistically significant association was found between the degree of facet
orientation asymmetry and the severity of degenerative disc disease. However,
this analysis was secondary within that investigation.9
In the present study, we evaluated a larger number of spinal levels to confirm
or refute those findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Magnetic
resonance imaging studies were evaluated using a Siemens Espree 1.5 Tesla high
field scanner. A total of 300 lumbar levels at L4 to L5 and L5 to S1 were
analyzed in 150 patients, including 87 women and 63 men, with an age range from
33 to 82 years. Bilateral facet joint inclination angles were measured, as
illustrated in Figure 1, along with the
difference between facet inclinations on both sides and the degree of disc
degeneration according to the Pfirrmann classification9 shown in
Figure 2.
Based on
disc degeneration severity, patients were divided into two groups. Mild
degenerative disc disease included Pfirrmann grades 1, 2, and 3, whereas severe
degenerative disc disease included grades 4 and 5. Facet tropism was considered
present when there was a difference of 5 degrees or more between the
inclination of the facet joints on each side.1,10
Facet angles were measured on the mid axial slice of the corresponding disc,
parallel to the inferior endplate of the superior vertebral body.
The
primary objective of the study was to evaluate whether facet tropism is
associated with more severe disc degeneration. To this end, levels were divided
into two groups, with facet tropism and without facet tropism, and their
association with the two degenerative disc disease groups was analyzed. In
addition, the magnitude of the difference in facet inclination between sides
was compared between the mild and severe degenerative disc disease groups.
Furthermore, in a subgroup of 93 levels at L4 to L5 and L5 to S1 presenting
with disc protrusions, we evaluated whether protrusion laterality corresponded
to the side with the more sagittally oriented facet joint. For this analysis,
disc protrusions were classified into two categories. One group included protrusions
lateralized toward the side of the more sagittal facet joint, and the other
included protrusions located on the less sagittal side or centrally and
symmetrically distributed.
All
analyses were performed per spinal level rather than per patient. All
measurements were conducted exclusively by the authors of the study. All
magnetic resonance imaging studies had been requested for evaluation of low
back pain or lumbar radiculopathy.
Exclusion
criteria included previous lumbar spine surgery, scoliosis, tumor, infection,
or fracture in the lumbar region, lumbosacral transitional vertebra, and lytic
spondylolisthesis. Upper lumbar levels were not included, as they have a
different anatomical facet orientation, with a greater sagittal component,
which could potentially affect the results.
Statistical Analysis
The
Mann–Whitney test was used for quantitative variables, and Fisher’s exact test
was used for categorical variables. A p value <0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
RESULTS
The
results are shown in the Table. When
evaluating the association between facet tropism and severe degenerative disc
disease, no statistically significant association was found (p = 0.0904).
Similarly, no statistically significant difference was observed when comparing
the degree of facet inclination difference between levels with mild and severe
degenerative disc disease (p = 0.9207). In the subgroup of patients with lumbar
disc protrusions, no statistically significant association was found between
the side of the protrusion and the side of the most sagittally oriented facet
joint (p = 0.1500).
DISCUSSION
It
remains unclear whether facet tropism is a consequence of disc and facet
degeneration leading to progressive joint remodeling, or whether it represents
a developmental condition that may, in turn, predispose to degenerative disc
disease and facet degeneration. It is also possible that both mechanisms
coexist.3,4,11 The criteria used
to define facet tropism vary widely in the literature. Although in this study
we defined facet tropism as an asymmetry of 5 degrees or more between the
orientation of the facet joints on each side, other studies have used
thresholds ranging from 1 to 10 degrees, while some define facet tropism as a
difference greater than one standard deviation.1,5,10,11
These methodological differences may clearly influence the results reported
across studies.
In
contrast to studies reporting a significant correlation between facet tropism
and degenerative disc disease, our study did not demonstrate an association
between facet tropism and severe degenerative disc disease. This discrepancy
may be partially explained by differences in how disc degeneration was
classified. In the present study, degenerative disc disease was divided into
mild and severe categories based on Pfirrmann grades, whereas other studies
considered only the presence or absence of degeneration, or used different
grading groupings.2,9,12-15
Özdemir and Boyalı found no statistically significant relationship between
facet tropism and degenerative disc disease at the L3 to L4, L4 to L5, and L5
to S1 levels.13 Noren et al. also
reported no association between the magnitude of facet tropism and the presence
of degenerative disc disease at the same lumbar levels.3 Vanharanta et al. found no significant
correlation between the presence of facet tropism and degenerative disc
disease, nor between the magnitude of the facet tropism angle and disc
degeneration.16 These findings
are consistent with those of our study. Similarly, Boden et al. and Kong et al.
reported no association between facet tropism and degenerative disc disease.17,18 In contrast, Gao et al. reported that
facet tropism was associated with three degenerative conditions related to disc
disease: degenerative spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis, and lumbar
disc herniation.14 Karatas et al.
reported a significant association between facet tropism and degenerative disc
disease at L5 to S1, while Pichaisak et al. observed a similar association at
L4 to L5.4,19
Although
no association was found in our study between the side of the most sagittally
oriented facet joint and the side of disc protrusion, the literature presents
conflicting results on this issue. Ke et al. reported that disc herniations at
L4 to L5 were more frequent on the more sagittal facet side in patients aged 18
to 35 years.9 Similar to our
findings, Cassidy et al. found no association between the sagittal or coronal
orientation of the facet joints and the side of disc herniation at L4 to L5 and
L5 to S1.10 Zhou et al. also
failed to demonstrate such a correlation when evaluating all lumbar levels.2 Degulmadi et al. reported an association
between the more sagittal facet side and disc herniation at L4 to L5 and L5 to
S1. They proposed that, during flexion and extension, the more coronal facet
resists angular motion, whereas the more sagittal facet does not, allowing
excessive rotation that generates indirect tension on the annulus fibrosus on
the sagittal side, potentially leading to disc prolapse on that same side.12 Conversely, Tisot et al. reported a
statistically significant correlation between the more coronally oriented facet
joint and the side of disc herniation. The authors suggested that lower
resistance to shear forces on the coronal facet side results in increased
rotational stress (twist) and
progressive damage to the annulus fibrosus fibers on that side.11
This
study has several limitations. Although 300 levels were analyzed, the presence
of disc protrusions was not evaluated at all levels, which prevented analysis
of the association between facet tropism and the development of lumbar disc
protrusions. As a result, the subgroup of levels with protrusions was smaller
than it could have been.
In
addition, the association between facet tropism and spinal instability was not
evaluated, as only magnetic resonance imaging was analyzed. However, this
relationship has been partially studied previously, and no statistically
significant association was reported.1
CONCLUSIONS
No
statistically significant association was found between facet tropism and
severe degenerative disc disease at the L4 to L5 and L5 to S1 levels. Likewise,
no association was identified between the side of the disc protrusion and the
side of the most sagittally oriented facet joint at these same levels.
REFERENCES
1. Bendersky
D, Asem M, Navarrete O. Lumbar facet effusions and other degeneration
parameters and its association with instability. Neurol India 2022;70(Suppl):S224-S229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.360912
2. Zhou Q,
Teng D, Zhang T, Lei X, Jiang W. Association of facet tropism and orientation
with lumbar disc herniation in young patients. Neurol Sci 2018;39(5):841-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3270-0
3. Noren R,
Trafimow J, Andersson GB, Huckman MS. The role of facet joint tropism and facet
angle in disc degeneration. Spine (Phila
Pa 1976) 1991;16(5):530-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199105000-00008
4. Pichaisak
W, Chotiyarnwong C, Chotiyarnwong P. Facet joint orientation and tropism in
lumbar degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis. J Med Assoc Thai 2015;98(4):373-9.
PMID: 25958712
5. Yadav S,
Arya R, Dakshinamoorthy R, Jha AA, Jain S, Kumar I. Facet tropism/inclination
and its association with intervertebral disc herniation in the lumbar spine – a
radiological evaluation. Rev Bras Ortop
2022;57(6):941-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742338
6. Lai Q,
Liu Y, Guo R, Lv X, Wang Q, Zhu J, et al. A study of lumbar disc herniation and
facet joint asymmetry. Int Surg
2018;103(1-2):87-94. https://doi.org/10.9738/INTSURG-D-16-00119.1
7. Karacan
I, Aydin T, Sahin Z, Cidem M, Koyuncu H, Aktas I, et al. Facet angles in lumbar
disc herniation: their relation to anthropometric features. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
2004;29(10):1132-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200405150-00016
8. Samartzis
D, Cheung JP, Rajasekaran S, Kawaguchi Y, Acharya S, Kawakami M, et al. Is
lumbar facet joint tropism developmental or secondary to degeneration? An
international, large-scale multicenter study by the AOSpine Asia Pacific
Research Collaboration Consortium. Scoliosis
Spinal Disord 2016;11:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-016-0062-2
9. Ke S, Sun T, Zhang W, Zhang J, Li Z. Are there correlations between
facet joint parameters and lumbar disk herniation laterality in young adults? J Clin Neurosci 2023;109:50-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2023.01.013
10. Cassidy
JD, Loback D, Yong-Hing K, Tchang S. Lumbar facet joint asymmetry.
Intervertebral disc herniation. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17(5):570-4. PMID: 1621158
11. Tisot RA,
Vieira JDS, Collares DDS, Stumm LD, Fontana MF, Pasini A, et al. Influence of
facet tropism on the location of lumbar disc herniation. Coluna/Columna 2018;17(1):23-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120181701179264
12. Degulmadi
D, Dave B, Krishnan A, Patel D. The relationship of facet joint orientation and
tropism with lumbar disc herniation and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the
lower lumbar spine. Asian Spine J
2019;13(1):22-8. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0116
13. Özdemir
Ö, Boyalı O. Relationship between facet tropism, lumbar degeneration and facet
degeneration. J Turk Spinal Surg
2023;34(1):13-7. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2022.54254
14. Gao T, Lai
Q, Zhou S, Liu X, Liu Y, Zhan P, et al. Correlation between facet tropism and
lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1):483. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1849-x
15. Alonso F,
Kirkpatrick CM, Jeong W, Fisahn C, Usman S, Rustagi T, et al. Lumbar facet
tropism: a comprehensive review. World
Neurosurg 2017;102:91-6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.028
16. Vanharanta
H, Floyd T, Ohnmeiss DD, Hochschuler SH, Guyer RD. The relationship of facet
tropism to degenerative disc disease. Spine
(Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18(8):1000-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199306150-00008
17. Boden SD,
Riew KD, Yamaguchi K, Branch TP, Schellinger D, Wiesel SW. Orientation of the
lumbar facet joints: association with degenerative disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78(3):403-1.
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199603000-00012
18. Kong MH,
He W, Tsai YD, Chen NF, Keorochana G, Do DH, et al. Relationship of facet
tropism with degeneration and stability of functional spinal unit. Yonsei Med J 2009;50(5):624-9. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2009.50.5.624
19. Karatas
Y, Kaya B, Kalkan E. The relationship of facet tropism with disc degeneration
at L5-S1 level. Clin Surg 2019;4:2569. Available at: https://www.clinicsinsurgery.com/open-access/the-relationship-of-facet-tropism-with-disc-degeneration-at-l5-5139.pdf
M. Ormeño Figueroa ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9271-351X
Received on May 30th, 2025.
Accepted after evaluation on December 13th, 2025 • Dr.
Damián Bendersky • damianbendersky@hotmail.com
• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4236
How to
cite this article: Bendersky D, Ormeño Figueroa M. Is
Facet Tropism Associated with Degenerative Disc Disease and the Laterality of
Disc Protrusions? Rev Asoc Argent
Ortop Trauma-tol 2026;91(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.1.2172
Article
Info
Identification: https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.1.2172
Published: February, 2026
Conflict
of interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Copyright: © 2026, Revista de la Asociación Argentina de
Ortopedia y Traumatología.
License:
This article is under Attribution-NonCommertial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Creative Commons License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0).