Scores II HAND

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.3.1583

Keywords:

Scales, scores, tables, update

Abstract

The Editorial Committee wants to provide its readers with an update on the commonly used scales. The use of tables and scales is a widespread practice in Orthopedics and Traumatology. The measurement and quantification of clinical, functional, and radiographic aspects have become essential tools for decision-making in different aspects of healthcare activity. We carried out a review of the most used scales, defining their use and including original and updated literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ernesto Bersusky, Pediatric Hospital “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Pediatric Hospital “Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Ignacio Arzac Ulla, BR Traumatología, Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    BR Traumatología, Azul, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Lidia G. Loterzo, Central Hospital of San Isidro “Dr. Melchor Angel Posse”, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Central Hospital of San Isidro “Dr. Melchor Angel Posse”, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Guillermo Ricciardi, Acute General Hospital “Dr. Teodoro Álvarez”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Acute General Hospital “Dr. Teodoro Álvarez”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Gerardo Zanotti, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Juan Martín Patiño, Hospital Militar Central “Cirujano Mayor Dr. Cosme Argerich”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Hospital Militar Central “Cirujano Mayor Dr. Cosme Argerich”, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

- Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C. Measuring the whole or the parts?: validity,

reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different

regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14(2):128-42. PMID: 11382253

- http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/available-translations

- Hosokawa T, Tajika T, Suto M, Chikuda H. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores in 961 Japanese volunteers. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2020;28(3):2309499020970656. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020970656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499020970656

- Hillesund S, Fromreide I, Foss OA, Finsen V. The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018;52(5):294-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938

- Smith-Forbes V, Howell DM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, Uhl TL. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for

three hand therapy acute upper limb conditions. Mil Med 2018;183(suppl_1):522-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx199

- Barai A, Lambie B, Cosgrave C, Baxter J. Management of distal radius fractures in the emergency department: A longterm functional outcome measure study with the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Emerg Med Australas 2018;30(4):530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.12946

- Wormdal AH, Tallaksen SH, Hagen Ø, Foss OA, Finsen V. Remembered preoperative Quick disabilities of the arm,

shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017;42(1):78-83. https://doi.org/1177/1753193416665299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193416665299

- Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities

of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and

Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S174-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630

- Hong SW, Gong HS, Park JW, Roh YH, Baek GH. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Korean version of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Korean Med Sci 2018;33(40):e249. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e249

- Hillesund S, Fromreide I, Foss OA, Finsen V. The value of remembered pre-operative quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scores. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2018;52(5):294-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2018.1483938

- Smith-Forbes V, Howell DM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, Uhl TL. A retrospective cohort study of QuickDASH scores for

three hand therapy acute upper limb conditions. Mil Med 2018;183(suppl_1):522-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx199

- Campbell DA, Kay SP. The Hand Injury Severity Scoring System. J Hand Surg Br 1996;21(3):295-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80187-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80187-1

- Bhat AK, Acharya AM, Mishra D. Correlation of HISS and Strickland Score with the Michigan Hand Outcome

Questionnaire in hand injuries. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;11(4):620-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.026

- Çapkın S, Cavit A, Yılmaz K, Erdoğan E, Kaleli T. Associations between initial injury severity in acute hand, wrist or forearm injuries and disability ratings and time to return to work. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2020;26(3):453-61. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.40524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2019.40524

- Tezel N, Can A. The association between injury severity and psychological morbidity, hand function, and return to work in traumatic hand injury with major nerve involvement: A one-year follow-up study. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2020;26(6):905-10. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.39472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.39472

- Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire

for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75(11):1585-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002

- de Carvalho Leite JC, Jerosch-Herold C, Song F. A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-78

- Oteo-Álvaro Á, Marín MT, Matas JA, Vaquero J. Validación al castellano de la escala Boston Carpal Tunnel

Questionnaire. Med Clin (Barc) 2016;146(6):247-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2015.10.013

- Andani Cervera J, Balbastre Tejedor M, Gómez Pajares F, Garrido Lahiguera R, López Ferreres A.. Valoración del

cuestionario de BOSTON como screening en patología laboral por síndrome del túnel carpiano. Rev Asoc Esp Espec Med Trab [online]. 2017;26(1):31-8. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1132-62552017000100004#:~:text=El%20cuestionario%20de%20Boston%20incluye,s%C3%ADndrome%20del%20

t%C3%BAnel%20carpiano%20laboral

Published

2022-06-25

Issue

Section

Postgraduate instruction

Categories

How to Cite

Scores II HAND. (2022). Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 87(3), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.3.1583

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>