Access to Musculoskeletal Imaging Studies in Argentina: Are Orthopaedic Surgeons Mere Bystanders?

Keywords: Digital imaging, orthopaedics and traumatology, outpatient imaging, diagnostic imaging, surveys, questionnaires

Abstract

Introduction: Access to imaging study results has undergone substantial changes in recent years, affecting the practice of orthopaedic surgeons. Objective: To evaluate the perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons in Argentina regarding access to imaging studies, image quality, and the impact of these factors on clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A total of 323 members of the Argentine Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology participated in the survey. Data were analyzed according to years in practice, geographic region, workplace, and subspecialty. Results: A significant change in access to imaging studies was observed, with 62% of respondents reporting a substantial impact. Nearly 50% reported being dissatisfied with current access methods, and 47% indicated that access difficulties frequently or very frequently had a negative impact on their clinical practice. According to 29% of respondents, attempts to access imaging studies took up as much as 40-50% of the consultation time. Ninety-two percent had received no formal training in the use of the new digital platforms. Perceptions of image quality varied, with 24% considering it worse than in their previous experience. Conclusions: Orthopaedic surgeons in Argentina report high levels of dissatisfaction and frequent difficulties accessing imaging studies. A lack of training and insufficient consideration of physicians as primary userscontribute to this perception. This study highlights the need to involve healthcare professionals as key stakeholders in the design and implementation of imaging access systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Moya, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
José Luis Osma Rueda, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
Santiago Focaraccio, Centro Médico San Lucas, Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Centro Médico San Lucas, Gualeguaychú, Entre Ríos, Argentina
Juan Carlos Uribe Caputi, Grupo de Investigación Observatorio de Salud Pública de Santander, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
Grupo de Investigación Observatorio de Salud Pública de Santander, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia
Santiago Ávila Posada, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Miguel Ángel Flores Ruiz, Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
Federico Alfano, Orthopedic Surgery Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Orthopedic Surgery Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Diego Gómez, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

Kruger P, Lynskey S, Sutherland A. Are orthopaedic surgeons reading radiology reports? A Trans-Tasman Survey. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019;63(3):324-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12871

Olthof AW, Shouche P, Fennema EM, IJpma FFA, Koolstra RHC, Stirler VMA, et al. Machine learning based natural language processing of radiology reports in orthopaedic trauma. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2021;208:106304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106304

Fridell K, Aspelin P, Felländer-Tsai L, Lundberg N. The effect of PACS on the practice of orthopaedic surgeons. J

Telemed Telecare 2011;17(3):137-41. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.100107

Wade FA, Oliver CW. Living with digital imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(421):25-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000126870.74832.d7

Lutsky K, Leinberry C, Gallant G, Takei R, Kwok M, Beredjiklian P. An evaluation of digital imaging studies in an

outpatient orthopedic setting. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2019;7(3):235-8. PMID: 31312680

Juenemann S, Hasler C, Brunner R. Digital imaging data on CD-R: a time trap for orthopaedic surgeons in outpatient clinics. J Child Orthop 2009;3(1):59-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-008-0150-9

Alderson PO. Customer service and satisfaction in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(2):319-23.

https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.2.1750319

Camponovo EJ. Radiologist-patient contact: a different perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1(12):998-9; author

reply 1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2004.09.021

Pilling JR. Picture archiving and communication systems: the users‘ view. Br J Radiol 2003;76(908):519-24.

https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/67551353

Moya D, Gómez D, Vila M, Alfano F. ¿Somos los cirujanos argentinos de hombro y codo los peor tratados de

Iberoamérica? Comparación de los honorarios y el nivel de satisfacción entre los miembros de la Asociación

Argentina de Cirugía de Hombro y Codo, y los colegas de Iberoamérica. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol 2022;87(4):540-58. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.4.1593

Wojciech C, Hennrikus W, Kish A, Armstrong D. Use of CD-ROMS for digital image viewing during new pediatric orthopaedic consults - Do we need a standardized viewer for digital imaging? J Musculoskelet Disord Treat 2016;2(1): 006 pp:1-3. Disponible en: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d4c7/66a71cf8b0cb597493be7a188843cc8dea2d.pdf

Lindsay R, McKinstry S, Vallely S, Thornbury G. What influences clinician‘s satisfaction with radiology services?

Insights Imaging 2011;2(4):425-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-011-0099-y

Jorwekar GJ, Dandekar KN, Baviskar PK. Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS): Clinician‘s

perspective about filmless imaging. Indian J Surg 2015;77(Suppl 3):774-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-013-0998-x

Chan L, Trambert M, Kywi A, Hartzman S. PACS in private practice--effect on profits and productivity. J Digit

Imaging 2002;15(Suppl 1):131-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-002-5019-8

Ondategui-Parra S, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Nathanson E, Gill IE, Ros PR. Use of productivity and financial indicators for monitoring performance in academic radiology departments: U.S. nationwide survey. Radiology

;236(1):214-9. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2361040456

Hoe J. Quality service in radiology. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2007;3(3):e24. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.3.3.e24

Published
2026-08-29
How to Cite
Moya, D., Osma Rueda, J. L., Focaraccio, S., Uribe Caputi, J. C., Ávila Posada, S., Flores Ruiz, M. Ángel, Alfano, F., & Gómez, D. (2026). Access to Musculoskeletal Imaging Studies in Argentina: Are Orthopaedic Surgeons Mere Bystanders?. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 91(4), 330-342. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2026.91.4.2336
Section
Clinical Research

Most read articles by the same author(s)