Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures with a Retrograde Intramedullary Tibial Nail

Main Article Content

Marcelo Walter Río
Guillermo Gotter
Patricio Salonia
Duilio Gabas
Fernando Barrera Oro
Enzo Sperone
Emanuel Fedún Rodríguez

Abstract

Background: This study aims to present our experience and outcomes in the treatment of distal tibia fractures using a retrograde intramedullary locking tibial nail.
Materials and Methods: This implant was indicated for fractures of the distal tibia (within 10 cm of the tibiotalar joint), soft tissue injury on the medial aspect of the leg, injuries in the knee area, or ipsilateral knee arthroplasty.
Results: A total of 15 patients (13 men, 2 women) with a mean age of 51.5 years were treated. Four cases involved open fractures—three classified as Gustilo IIIA and one as IIIB. Fracture healing was achieved within four months postoperatively in eight cases, while the remaining seven required five months (RUST score: 12). No angular deformities were observed in the distal tibia after bone union. According to the AOFAS score, 12 patients had excellent outcomes, while three had fair results.
Conclusions: Retrograde intramedullary tibial nailing is a viable option for treating distal tibia fractures, providing rotational and axial stability comparable to conventional implants. While the initial results are promising, further studies with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm its long-term effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Río, M. W., Gotter, G., Salonia, P., Gabas, D., Barrera Oro, F., Sperone, E., & Fedún Rodríguez, E. (2025). Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures with a Retrograde Intramedullary Tibial Nail. Revista De La Asociación Argentina De Ortopedia Y Traumatología, 90(2), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2025.90.2.1988
Section
Clinical Research
Author Biographies

Marcelo Walter Río, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Guillermo Gotter, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Patricio Salonia, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Duilio Gabas, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Fernando Barrera Oro, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Enzo Sperone, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Emanuel Fedún Rodríguez, Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

Orthopedics and Traumatology Service, Clínica Zabala, Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

References

1. Daolagupu A, Mudgal A, Agarwala V, Dutta K. A comparative study of intramedullary interlocking nailing and
minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in extra articular distal tibial fractures. Indian J Orthop 2017;51:292-8.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.205674

2. Iqbal H, Pidikiti P. Treatment of distal tibia metaphyseal fractures; plating versus intramedullary nailing: a
systematic review of recent evidence. Foot Ankle Surg 2013;19(3):143-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.007

3. Gupta R, Rohilla R, Sangwan K, Singh V, Walia S. Locking plate fixation in distal metaphyseal tibial fractures:
series of 79 patients. Int Orthop 2010;34:1285-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0880-4

4. Kuhn D, Appelmann P, Pairon P, Mehler D, Rommens P. The retrograde tibial nail: Presentation and biomechanical evaluation of a new concept in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Injury 2014;45(Suppl 1):S81-S86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.025

5. Gustilo R, Anderson J. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58(4):453-8. PMID: 773941

6. Whelan D, Bhandari M, Stephen D. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the
assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 2010;68(3):629-32.
https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d

7. Madeley N, Wing K, Topliss C, Penner MJ, Glazebrook MA, Younger AS. Responsiveness and validity of the SF-
36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis.
Foot Ankle Int 2012;33(1):57-63. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.0057

8. Bin P, Teng W, Wenfu T, Weiming G, Min H. Novel retrograde intramedullary tibial nailing for distal tibial fractures. Front Surg 2022;9:899483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.899483